Op 19 dec. 2011, om 19:57 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven: > On Monday 19 December 2011 19:48:48 Koen Kooi wrote: >> I will say again: I absolutely HATE that virtual-runtime nonsense. If you >> need to change a task, change the task, don't introduce things that make it >> non deterministic. Guess what happens when you change a virtual-runtime >> *after* you have built the task already. > > This is the problem I'm trying to avoid. Perhaps it wasn't clear, but what I > meant was change things so we do not bring in psplash via a task anymore - > instead use the value of VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_splash within core-image.bbclass, > controlled via an IMAGE_FEATURE.
In OE-classic we had IMAGE_SPLASH. Btw, I'm not using core-image.bbclase. >>> Would update-alternatives be needed at all in >>> that case? >> >> It would if you want to change it after booting :) > > What's the use case for changing the splash image after booting? If you splash contains text its nice to be able to exchange it as easily as the rest of the system.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
