On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 18:56, Richard Purdie < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 18:54 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > Come to think of it, maybe it's okay in this situation to actually > > remove OEHasPackage - the test will simply always run, and will still > > fail if the package is absent, but the failure would be less specific > > than a missing package. > > Lighting up the autobuilder with failures will just mean people no > longer know which failures matter, so no, this isn't an option. > I didn't mean the AB (which has a universal list of test suites for all images, which means the tests have to adapt via OeHasPackage), but rather what we have here: several lists of tests that are tightly coupled to their respective test images. In this situation OEHasPackage is counter-productive. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#139511): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/139511 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74855190/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
