On Fri, 2020-06-19 at 21:43 +0200, Christian Eggers wrote: > eudev is required by networkmanager. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <[email protected]> > --- > meta/recipes-core/udev/eudev_3.2.9.bb | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/udev/eudev_3.2.9.bb b/meta/recipes- > core/udev/eudev_3.2.9.bb > index f96f8cbe78..a4cec456d9 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/udev/eudev_3.2.9.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/udev/eudev_3.2.9.bb > @@ -94,3 +94,5 @@ pkg_postinst_eudev-hwdb () { > pkg_prerm_eudev-hwdb () { > rm -f $D${sysconfdir}/udev/hwdb.bin > } > + > +BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
A native eudev is a really bad idea, a nativesdk one isn't much better. If there are libs we need from here, then the recipe should only be generating those but a "native eudev" makes no sense to be needed by a build system. In case I'm not being clear enough, is bitbake going to replace the udev/systemd from your host system at run time? Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#139706): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/139706 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74987445/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
