On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 19:53 +0100, Alex Kiernan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 6:34 PM Richard Purdie
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 11:57 +0100, Alex Kiernan wrote:
> > > Generate output for each contaminated path so it's visible in the main
> > > log file, then enable rootfs_check_host_user_contaminated by default.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alex Kiernan <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - expose each contaminated path in the main log
> > > 
> > >  meta/classes/rootfs-postcommands.bbclass | 9 ++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Thanks, this is definitely more helpful. Some warnings in the test
> > build:
> > 
> > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/50/builds/2046
> > 
> > step1b: WARNING: core-image-sato-sdk-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Path in the rootfs 
> > is owned by the same user or group as the user running bitbake: 
> > /var/lib/nfs/statd
> > step1b: WARNING: core-image-sato-sdk-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Path in the rootfs 
> > is owned by the same user or group as the user running bitbake: 
> > /var/lib/nfs/statd/sm.bak
> > step1b: WARNING: core-image-sato-sdk-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Path in the rootfs 
> > is owned by the same user or group as the user running bitbake: 
> > /var/lib/nfs/statd/state
> > step1b: WARNING: core-image-sato-sdk-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Path in the rootfs 
> > is owned by the same user or group as the user running bitbake: 
> > /var/lib/nfs/statd/sm
> > 
> > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/44/builds/2073
> > 
> > step3b: WARNING: core-image-sato-1.0-r0 do_rootfs: Path in the rootfs is 
> > owned by the same user or group as the user running bitbake: 
> > /var/cache/fontconfig/CACHEDIR.TAG
> > 
> > which does raise more questions.
> > 
> 
> I'm having no luck reproducing either of these locally :|

They don't reproduce on the autobuilder either. We're probably going to
need to open a bug in bugzilla and enter these there listing the target
that caused it and the host it was on.

Hopefully we'll see a pattern emerge.

Or maybe the pseudo fix I posted will make it all go away. I can live
in hope right?!

Either way, I think this patch is going to be a longer journey until we
figure out what is happening.

Cheers,

Richard

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#139791): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/139791
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/75035700/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to