On Wed, 2020-06-24 at 23:57 +0800, Xu, Yanfei wrote: > > On 6/24/20 9:08 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-06-24 at 09:47 +0800, Xu, Yanfei wrote: > > > On 6/24/20 5:51 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 10:31 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 7:47 AM <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > From: Yanfei Xu <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > Some filesystems don't support symlink, then you will get > > > > > > failure > > > > > > when > > > > > > you install or update the kernel rpm package. Now we use a > > > > > > copy > > > > > > of > > > > > > image for these filesystems instead of symlink. > > > > > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]> > > > > > > Suggested-by: Richard Purdie < > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <[email protected]> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass > > > > > > b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass > > > > > > index 20a0135fc9..1269b54343 100644 > > > > > > --- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass > > > > > > +++ b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass > > > > > > @@ -94,6 +94,22 @@ python __anonymous () { > > > > > > d.appendVar('RDEPENDS_%s-image' % kname, ' %s- > > > > > > image- > > > > > > %s' % > > > > > > (kname, typelower)) > > > > > > d.setVar('PKG_%s-image-%s' % (kname,typelower), > > > > > > '%s- > > > > > > image- > > > > > > %s-${KERNEL_VERSION_PKG_NAME}' % (kname, typelower)) > > > > > > d.setVar('ALLOW_EMPTY_%s-image-%s' % (kname, > > > > > > typelower), > > > > > > '1') > > > > > > + d.setVar('pkg_postinst_ontarget_%s-image-%s' % > > > > > > (kname,typelower), """ > > > > > > > > > > You were previously concerned about boot issues if the > > > > > unversioned > > > > > image link/copy was deferred until boot. I don't see a > > > > > summary of > > > > > why > > > > > that's no longer a concern in the v3 of the patch. Can you > > > > > confirm > > > > > that it isn't an issue ? Is it simply because the booted > > > > > image > > > > > isn't > > > > > installed via this package, and hence we are fine ? > > > > > > > > I'm suspecting this patch is why we're seeing selftest > > > > failures: > > > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/86/builds/1055 > > > > > > > Do you mean this patch has been applied? and introduce new > > > issues? > > > > Yes, I reverted it and retested and confirmed this patch causes the > > selftest failure in the link to the build above. > > > OK, I am trying to analyse the log. But I haven't figured out what > cause > it fialed， and how to reproduce it on my mechine. I'd apprecate any > information.
The command to reproduce should be: oe-selftest -r efibootpartition.GenericEFITest.test_boot_efi Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#139893): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/139893 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74977721/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
