On 04/07/2020 23.10, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 11:48:36AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> ...
>> I hadn't realised there was already the reverse dependency. I think we
>> need to let the package exist in both cases so the two dependencies
>> need to reverse direction depending on whether single-binary is set.
>> ...
>
> What about no separate coreutils-stdbuf package with single-binary,
> instead an RPROVIDES of coreutils-stdbuf?
That would probably work. That's essentially the first patch, plus a
RPROVIDES_coreutils += "${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG',
'single-binary', 'coreutils-stdbuf', '', d)}"
line, right?
Rasmus
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#140320):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/140320
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/75275273/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
