Hi Christian,
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 03:17:34PM +0200, Christian Eggers wrote:
> The default license (GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception & GPLv3) is not suitable
> for installing libgcc-lic on an image where INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE is set
> to "GPL-3.0".
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <[email protected]>
> ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc.inc | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc.inc
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc.inc
> index 6d48ec9809..372da46459 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/libgcc.inc
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ PACKAGES = "\
> LICENSE_${PN} = "GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception"
> LICENSE_${PN}-dev = "GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception"
> LICENSE_${PN}-dbg = "GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception"
> +LICENSE_${PN}-lic = "GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception"
>
Not really directing the question to you but... does this actually makes
sense? Is the license licensed? Can't we just empty LICENSE_${PN}-lic or
not check the license for this package? That might be something that can
be done in the license.bbclass for example.
Nothing else to say though on that particular patch :)
Quentin
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#140482):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/140482
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/75396771/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
