ignore this one. should have been squished a local change. -armin
On 7/26/20 7:50 PM, akuster via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > If the "tmp/cve_check" file was not create as in the case for -c > populate_sdk, just print a > warning instead of dumping a trace back > > Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <[email protected]> > --- > meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass > index e61c90e5600..b16da9890af 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ python cve_save_summary_handler () { > cve_tmp_file = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_TMP_FILE") > > if not os.path.isfile(cve_tmp_file): > - bb.warn("File Not found, check has no affect: %s" % cve_tmp_file) > + bb.warn("File Not found: %s" % cve_tmp_file) > return > > cve_summary_name = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_SUMMARY_FILE_NAME") > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#140973): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/140973 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/75815497/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
