On 7/27/20 2:39 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Sun, 2020-07-26 at 19:52 -0700, akuster wrote: >> If the "tmp/cve_check" file was not create as in the case for -c >> populate_sdk, just print a >> warning instead of dumping a trace back >> >> --- >> v2] lets include the missing part of the patch >> >> Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <[email protected]> >> --- >> meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass b/meta/classes/cve- >> check.bbclass >> index 0889e7544aa..b16da9890af 100644 >> --- a/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass >> +++ b/meta/classes/cve-check.bbclass >> @@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ python cve_save_summary_handler () { >> >> cve_tmp_file = d.getVar("CVE_CHECK_TMP_FILE") >> >> + if not os.path.isfile(cve_tmp_file): >> + bb.warn("File Not found: %s" % cve_tmp_file) >> + return >> + > A warning is something the user really needs to fix or take some action > about. Is this a warning? Its actually an error in certail conditions. Do we want this to be silent or fail on 'populate_sdk'? > > Cheers, > > Richard > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#140982): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/140982 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/75815509/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
