On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 3:20 PM Joshua Watt <[email protected]> wrote: > > I spent some time digging into the build failures that Steve > encountered ([1], [2]) when pulling in my patch to make the build fail > if Storable.pm wasn't place in an arch specific directory. As it turns > out, this may be a false alarm. I dug into the perl code and it > appears that this change [3] (introduced for 5.31.3) moved the > installation of Storable.pm from the base directory to the arch > specific one. By my reading of the code and empirical evidence of > diffing the build output, this happens because Storable.pm is no > longer explicitly listed to be installed as > '$(INST_ARCHLIB)/Storable.pm', and thus defaults to the arch-specific > directory. Practically speaking, I believe this means that dunfell > (with perl 5.30) should always have Storable.pm in the base lib > directory, whereas master (with perl 5.32) should always have > Storable.pm in the arch specific directory. I don't have any > conclusions about what this means about our intermittent bug, but at a > minimum I suspect my patch is not appropriate for dunfell.
This makes sense. But what puzzles me is that while Fedora and Centos builds triggered the directory test failure, Ubuntu and Debian builds did not. Any theories? Steve > [1] https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/1245 > [2] https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/86/builds/1229 > [3] > https://github.com/Perl/perl5/commit/95173f94fe0c1b2b943af60e1f6c6e4c47b8a975#diff-03144331fb08a8b04b003b1a49659547L16
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#141455): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/141455 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/76180396/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
