On Mon, 2020-08-24 at 14:39 +0800, [email protected] wrote: > From: Khairul Rohaizzat Jamaluddin <[email protected]> > > Due to recent changes in bootimg-efi to include IMAGE_BOOT_FILES, > when both bootimg-partition and bootimg-efi occur in a single .wks > and IMAGE_BOOT_FILES are defined, files listed in IMAGE_BOOT_FILES > will be duplicated in both partition. > Since IMAGE_BOOT_FILES are crucial for bootimg-partition, but > optional for bootimg-efi, hence allow bootimg-efi to have the option > to ignore it. > > The new variable, excludeibf, in bootimg-efi.py need to be set in > the .wks file to make use of this feature. Simply remove the > variable from the the .wks file if not needed. > Example: > part /boot --source bootimg-efi --sourceparams="loader=systemd-boot, > excludeibf=y" --ondisk sda --label msdos --active --align 1024 --use-uuid > > [YOCTO #14011] > > Signed-off-by: Khairul Rohaizzat Jamaluddin > <[email protected]> > --- > scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/bootimg-efi.py | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
I'm torn between this and instead changing efi to use IMAGE_EFI_BOOT_FILES instead. Changing the variable would mean more flexibility in how the image is constructed... Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#141791): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/141791 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/76380555/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
