We want to test the SDK with PATH from the original host, not with our own tools injected via HOSTTOOLS. It even uses some tools which aren't in HOSTTOOLS.
This is necessary after changing the SDK to not reset PATH to the system default which is bad for other reasons and brings the testing into sync with that change. (From OE-Core rev: 87c9602fd0dedc7bcf75b822aaf5f6ebfc17737c) Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> --- meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/testsdk.py | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/testsdk.py b/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/testsdk.py index 785b5dda53a..c5c46df6cda 100644 --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/testsdk.py +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/sdkext/testsdk.py @@ -25,11 +25,8 @@ class TestSDKExt(TestSDKBase): subprocesstweak.errors_have_output() - # extensible sdk can be contaminated if native programs are - # in PATH, i.e. use perl-native instead of eSDK one. - paths_to_avoid = [d.getVar('STAGING_DIR'), - d.getVar('BASE_WORKDIR')] - os.environ['PATH'] = avoid_paths_in_environ(paths_to_avoid) + # We need the original PATH for testing the eSDK, not with our manipulations + os.environ['PATH'] = d.getVar("BB_ORIGENV", False).getVar("PATH") tcname = d.expand("${SDK_DEPLOY}/${TOOLCHAINEXT_OUTPUTNAME}.sh") if not os.path.exists(tcname): -- 2.25.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#142241): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/142241 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/76695638/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
