On Tue, 2020-09-08 at 12:28 +0800, Jamaluddin, Khairul Rohaizzat wrote: > From: Khairul Rohaizzat Jamaluddin < > [email protected]> > > Due to recent changes in bootimg-efi to include IMAGE_BOOT_FILES, > when both bootimg-partition and bootimg-efi occur in a single .wks > and IMAGE_BOOT_FILES are defined, files listed in IMAGE_BOOT_FILES > will be duplicated in both partition. > Since IMAGE_BOOT_FILES are crucial for bootimg-partition, but > optional for bootimg-efi, hence allowing bootimg-efi to have the > option > to ignore it. > > The new variable, IMAGE_EFI_BOOT_FILES, was added to help handle this > issue. Its basic usage is the same as IMAGE_BOOT_FILES. > Usage example: > ${IMGDEPLOYDIR}/${IMAGE_BASENAME}-${MACHINE}.ext4;rootfs.img > \ > > This commit is also squashed with the updated testcase to cover for > this change. > > [YOCTO #14011] > > Signed-off-by: Khairul Rohaizzat Jamaluddin < > [email protected]> > --- > meta/classes/image_types_wic.bbclass | 2 +- > meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/wic.py | 12 +++++++++++- > scripts/lib/wic/plugins/source/bootimg-efi.py | 8 ++++---- > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
The autobuilder still isn't convinced about this patch unfortunately: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/80/builds/1338 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/86/builds/1334 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/87/builds/1355 and probably https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/79/builds/1350 which it finishes. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#142260): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/142260 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/76702558/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
