Hi Jon,

That's not really a comment on the reorganization of compiler tunes, but more like "Do they actually do something meaningful?"

I posted here[1] some benchmarks and at least with the benchmarks I tried on the chips I tried there is no obvious impact.

i.mx6q:

TUNE_FEATURES        = "arm armv7a vfp thumb callconvention-hard"
TARGET_FPU           = "hard"

vs.

TUNE_FEATURES        = "arm vfp cortexa9 neon thumb callconvention-hard"
TARGET_FPU           = "hard"


i.m8mm:

TUNE_FEATURES        = "aarch64 cortexa53 crc crypto"
TARGET_FPU           = ""

vs.

TUNE_FEATURES        = "aarch64 armv8a crc crypto"
TARGET_FPU           = ""


[1] https://yoctoproject.blogspot.com/2020/09/compiler-tunes-benchmarks-with-yocto.html

Should we expect so see differences?

If so can you suggest benchmarks which show those differences?

Regards,

Robert
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#142576): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/142576
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/76844469/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to