On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:25 PM Phil Blundell <p...@pbcl.net> wrote: > If we're talking about OpenGLES applications, wouldn't you already have > opengl in DISTRO_FEATURES? >
Not necessarily. Adding opengl to DISTRO_FEATURES really means "enable a bunch of PACKAGECONFIGs all over the place because I need x11 and mesa with all the bells and whistles". These things are not necessary to build and run apps based on dispmanx. With this patch and my patch to meta-openembedded I'm able to build "core-image-minimal" with no x11/wayland, no window managers, with "userland" and with "glmark2". Here is my package list: 1 base-files_3.0.14-r89_raspberrypi3.ipk 2 base-passwd_3.5.29-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 3 bash_5.0-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 4 busybox_1.32.0-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 5 busybox-syslog_1.32.0-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 6 busybox-udhcpc_1.32.0-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 7 eudev_3.2.9-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 8 glmark2_2020.11+0+784aca755a-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 9 init-ifupdown_1.0-r7_raspberrypi3.ipk 10 initscripts-functions_1.0-r155_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 11 initscripts_1.0-r155_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 12 init-system-helpers-service_1.58-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 13 kbd_2.3.0-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 14 kernel-5.4.79-v7_1:5.4.79+git0+5d52d9eea9_9797f1a493-r0_raspberrypi3.ipk 15 kernel-module-i2c-bcm2708-5.4.79-v7_1:5.4.79+git0+5d52d9eea9_9797f1a493-r0_raspberrypi3.ipk 16 kernel-module-i2c-dev-5.4.79-v7_1:5.4.79+git0+5d52d9eea9_9797f1a493-r0_raspberrypi3.ipk 17 keymaps_1.0-r31_raspberrypi3.ipk 18 ldconfig_2.32-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 19 libblkid1_2.36-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 20 libc6_2.32-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 21 libgcc1_10.2.0-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 22 libjpeg62_1:2.0.6-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 23 libkmod2_27-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 24 libpng16-16_1.6.37-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 25 libstdc++6_10.2.0-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 26 libtinfo5_6.2-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 27 libz1_1.2.11-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 28 modutils-initscripts_1.0-r7_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 29 ncurses-terminfo-base_6.2-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 30 netbase_1:6.1-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 31 packagegroup-core-boot_1.0-r17_raspberrypi3.ipk 32 run-postinsts_1.0-r10_all.ipk 33 sysvinit-inittab_2.88dsf-r10_raspberrypi3.ipk 34 sysvinit-pidof_2.97-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 35 sysvinit_2.97-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 36 update-alternatives-opkg_0.4.3-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk 37 update-rc.d_0.8-r0_all.ipk 38 userland_20201027-r0_cortexa7t2hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk In my case my DISTRO_FEATURES include "x11" and this new "dispmanx". "userland" also includes a bunch of dispmanx test programs such as hello_tiger.bin that work as well. > I'm not sure it makes a lot of sense to introduce a check for dispmanx to > oe-core if nothing in oe-core ever defines that feature. > As I mentioned to Khem, I added this patch in order to support the changes I made to the recipe for glmark2 in meta-openembedded. If those can be done in a bbappend in the BSP layer then I'd be happy to re-asses, but I don't think they can. Maybe a better question is: does adding this DISTRO_FEATURE hurt anything in oe-core?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#145268): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/145268 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/78684120/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
