If that symbol is required, then we'd need to add it to the appropriate fragment in the reference kernel configurations (kernel-cache), and make sure it is built into the various kernel types.
Changes like that are submitted to the linux-yocto mailing list. That being said, I went and looked at the error, and the .c that defines the missing symbol is security.c, which is controlled by CONFIG_SECURITY, not CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM. And that option is already enabled in all kernel types. It looks more like a missing .h, versus a missing option to me. Have you looked at the systemtap source for an include of security.h, and traced why it wouldn't be finding the function definition ? If this is the on-target build, versus a cross build test, then maybe we are missing the copy of a .h to the target (but you'd think that we'd get a more obvious compile error if a .h wasn't found). Bruce On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 10:03 PM zangrc <zangrc.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Ping > > > > From: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org> On Behalf Of zangrc > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 9:51 AM > To: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sando...@linaro.org> > Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [OE-core] [PATCHv2] systemtap: upgrade 4.3 -> 4.4 > > > > I think this problem should be because the kernel does not enable > CONFIG_SECURITY_LOCKDOWN_LSM, > > do you need me to submit a patch to open this option of the kernel? > > > > Zangrc > > > > From: Zang, Ruochen/臧 若尘 > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2020 2:18 PM > To: 'Leonardo Sandoval' <leonardo.sando...@linaro.org> > Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH] [OE-core] [PATCHv2] systemtap: upgrade 4.3 -> 4.4 > > > > I will investigate, it may take some time, if the error is resolved, I will > send a patch to the mailing list. > > > > zangrc > > > > From: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sando...@linaro.org> > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2020 6:09 AM > To: Zang, Ruochen/臧 若尘 <zangrc.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> > Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [OE-core] [PATCHv2] systemtap: upgrade 4.3 -> 4.4 > > > > Hi Zangrc, > > > > this patch is now in master-next > > > > https://patchwork.openembedded.org/series/27030/ > > > > but autobuilder detected a compilation error in the upgraded version > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/61/builds/2736/steps/13/logs/stdio > > > > Can you please take a look? (seems like a C macro is not defined). > > > > Thanks, > > > > lsg > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 20:08, zangrc <zangrc.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > The test log of oe-selftest is as follows: > 2020-11-23 15:48:49,144 - oe-selftest - INFO - test_crosstap_helloworld > (runtime_test.SystemTap) > 2020-11-23 17:06:55,949 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... ok > 2020-11-23 17:06:55,951 - oe-selftest - INFO - test_crosstap_pstree > (runtime_test.SystemTap) > 2020-11-23 17:08:07,921 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... ok > 2020-11-23 17:08:07,922 - oe-selftest - INFO - test_crosstap_syscalls_by_pid > (runtime_test.SystemTap) > 2020-11-23 17:09:20,084 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... ok > 2020-11-23 17:09:20,085 - oe-selftest - INFO - test_crosstap_syscalls_by_proc > (runtime_test.SystemTap) > 2020-11-23 17:10:31,349 - oe-selftest - INFO - ... ok > 2020-11-23 17:12:58,052 - oe-selftest - INFO - > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > 2020-11-23 17:12:58,054 - oe-selftest - INFO - Ran 4 tests in 5051.537s > 2020-11-23 17:12:58,054 - oe-selftest - INFO - OK > 2020-11-23 17:13:08,416 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS: > 2020-11-23 17:13:08,417 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - > runtime_test.SystemTap.test_crosstap_helloworld: PASSED (4686.81s) > 2020-11-23 17:13:08,418 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - > runtime_test.SystemTap.test_crosstap_pstree: PASSED (71.97s) > 2020-11-23 17:13:08,418 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - > runtime_test.SystemTap.test_crosstap_syscalls_by_pid: PASSED (72.16s) > 2020-11-23 17:13:08,418 - oe-selftest - INFO - RESULTS - > runtime_test.SystemTap.test_crosstap_syscalls_by_proc: PASSED (71.26s) > 2020-11-23 17:13:08,432 - oe-selftest - INFO - SUMMARY: > 2020-11-23 17:13:08,432 - oe-selftest - INFO - oe-selftest () - Ran 4 tests > in 5051.540s > 2020-11-23 17:13:08,432 - oe-selftest - INFO - oe-selftest - OK - All > required tests passed (successes=4, skipped=0, failures=0, errors=0) > > Signed-off-by: Zang Ruochen <zangrc.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap_git.inc | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap_git.inc > b/meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap_git.inc > index 56fa51d61e..ae735025b7 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap_git.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap_git.inc > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > LICENSE = "GPLv2" > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a4263" > -SRCREV = "82b8e1a07a31bf37ed05d6ebc5162b054c0be9fd" > -PV = "4.3" > +SRCREV = "988f439af39a359b4387963ca4633649866d8275" > +PV = "4.4" > > SRC_URI = "git://sourceware.org/git/systemtap.git \ > > file://0001-Do-not-let-configure-write-a-python-location-into-th.patch \ > -- > 2.25.1 > > > > > > -- - Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end - "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#145411): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/145411 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/78469251/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
