On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 16:45 +0000, Sinan Kaya wrote: > Move the ip tool into its own package. Useful for size constrained > systems that only want the ip tool. > > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <[email protected]> > --- > .../iproute2/iproute2.inc | 47 ++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc > b/meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc > index 403d264308c..c7a3d547dae 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc > @@ -46,32 +46,75 @@ do_install () { > # The .so files in iproute2-tc are modules, not traditional libraries > INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-tc = "dev-so" > > -PACKAGES =+ "\ > +IPROUTE2_PACKAGES =+ "\ > + ${PN}-bridge \ > ${PN}-devlink \ > ${PN}-genl \ > + ${PN}-ifcfg \ > ${PN}-ifstat \ > + ${PN}-ip \ > + ${PN}-lib \ > ${PN}-lnstat \ > ${PN}-nstat \ > + ${PN}-rdma \ > + ${PN}-routef \ > + ${PN}-routel \ > + ${PN}-rtmon \ > + ${PN}-rtpr \ > ${PN}-rtacct \ > ${PN}-ss \ > ${PN}-tc \ > ${PN}-tipc \ > "
I accept there is a case for splitting out ip, the patch now splits out every binary though? That isn't what the commit message says... Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#145772): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/145772 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/79005154/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
