Hi
Am Donnerstag, den 17.12.2020, 11:23 +0000 schrieb Diego Sueiro:
> Since do_install is shipping files to /boot and ${sysconfdir}, we can set
> SYSROOT_DIRS to these dirs and allow recipes which depend on u-boot to use its
> installed artifacts from RECIPE_SYSROOT instead of DEPLOY_DIR_IMAGE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Diego Sueiro <[email protected]>
> ---
> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
> index 251178db33..6af0766571 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot.inc
> @@ -266,6 +266,8 @@ FILES_${PN}-env = " \
> "
>
> FILES_${PN} = "/boot ${datadir}"
> +SYSROOT_DIRS = "/boot ${sysconfdir}"
Wouldn't a += be more future proof. I.e. not dropping the directories which are
staged by default.
Max
> +
> RDEPENDS_${PN} += "${PN}-env"
>
> do_deploy () {
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#145857):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/145857
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/79034125/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
