Slightly alter a fallthrough comment so that GCC recognises it, and
add a default: case to a switch which explicitly only handles a few
values.

Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <[email protected]>
---
 pseudo.c        | 2 ++
 pseudo_client.c | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/pseudo.c b/pseudo.c
index ff8e1b9..55f0f18 100644
--- a/pseudo.c
+++ b/pseudo.c
@@ -1036,6 +1036,8 @@ pseudo_op(pseudo_msg_t *msg, const char *program, const 
char *tag, char **respon
                        pdb_may_unlink_file(msg, msg->client);
                }
                break;
+       default:
+               break;
        }
 
 op_exit:
diff --git a/pseudo_client.c b/pseudo_client.c
index 3c49644..eeb1fdc 100644
--- a/pseudo_client.c
+++ b/pseudo_client.c
@@ -1860,7 +1860,8 @@ pseudo_client_op(pseudo_op_t op, int access, int fd, int 
dirfd, const char *path
                break;
        case OP_OPEN:
                pseudo_client_path(fd, path);
-       case OP_EXEC: /* fallthrough */
+               /* fallthrough */
+       case OP_EXEC:
                do_request = pseudo_client_logging;
                break;
        case OP_CLOSE:
-- 
2.25.1

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#146543): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/146543
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/79523826/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to