If you can fix the deb packaging easily, then please do so, but it is not mandatory, and don't spend too much time if it turns out to be a time sink.
Alex On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 15:01, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Alexander, > > > > Did a quick test and it seems the rpm packaging classes don’t have this > issue. The rootfs_deb bbclass however has the same lock files like with > rootfs_ipk. > > Should I try to patch this too to keep them aligned? > > > > Kind regards, > > Michael > > > > -- > > *BMW Car IT GmbH* > Michael Ho > Spezialist Entwicklung – Build and Release Engineering > Lise-Meitner-Straße 14 > 89081 Ulm > > Tel.: +49-731-37804-071 > > Mobil: +49-152-54980-471 > Fax: +49-731-37804-001 > Mail: [email protected] > Web: http://www.bmw-carit.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > BMW Car IT GmbH > Geschäftsführer: Kai-Uwe Balszuweit und Michael Böttrich > Sitz und Registergericht: München HRB 134810 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > *From: *Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> > *Date: *Monday, 11. January 2021 at 13:46 > *To: *"Ho Michael, JC-3UL" <[email protected]> > *Cc: *OE-core <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rootfs_ipk: allow do_populate_sdk in > parallel to do_rootfs > > > > Does deb/rpm packaging already have this feature? > > > > Alex > > > > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 13:45, Michael Ho <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Michael Ho <[email protected]> > > Switch do_populate_sdk for the ipk package manager to use a separate target > opkg config file and separate the lockfiles restricting do_rootfs and > do_populate_sdk from running in parallel. > > This way if an image recipe includes a dependency to do_populate_sdk by > default then it will run in parallel to do_rootfs saving time compared to > the > sequential execution. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ho <[email protected]> > --- > meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass | 1 + > meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass | 4 ++-- > meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py | 6 ++++++ > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass > b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass > index 79cb36c..d31dba0 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ IMAGE_PKGTYPE ?= "ipk" > > IPKGCONF_TARGET = "${WORKDIR}/opkg.conf" > IPKGCONF_SDK = "${WORKDIR}/opkg-sdk.conf" > +IPKGCONF_SDK_TARGET = "${WORKDIR}/opkg-sdk-target.conf" > > PKGWRITEDIRIPK = "${WORKDIR}/deploy-ipks" > > diff --git a/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass > b/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass > index f1e0219..245c256 100644 > --- a/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass > +++ b/meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass > @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ do_rootfs[recrdeptask] += "do_package_write_ipk > do_package_qa" > do_rootfs[vardeps] += "PACKAGE_FEED_URIS PACKAGE_FEED_BASE_PATHS > PACKAGE_FEED_ARCHS" > > do_rootfs[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/ipk.lock" > -do_populate_sdk[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/ipk.lock" > -do_populate_sdk_ext[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/ipk.lock" > +do_populate_sdk[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/sdk-ipk.lock" > +do_populate_sdk_ext[lockfiles] += "${WORKDIR}/sdk-ipk.lock" > > OPKG_PREPROCESS_COMMANDS = "" > > diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py > b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py > index 37af034..e2ca415 100644 > --- a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py > +++ b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager/ipk/sdk.py > @@ -14,6 +14,12 @@ class PkgSdk(Sdk): > def __init__(self, d, manifest_dir=None): > super(PkgSdk, self).__init__(d, manifest_dir) > > + # In sdk_list_installed_packages the call to opkg is hardcoded to > + # always use IPKGCONF_TARGET and there's no exposed API to change > this > + # so simply override IPKGCONF_TARGET to use this separated config > file. > + ipkgconf_sdk_target = d.getVar("IPKGCONF_SDK_TARGET") > + d.setVar("IPKGCONF_TARGET", ipkgconf_sdk_target) > + > self.target_conf = self.d.getVar("IPKGCONF_TARGET") > self.host_conf = self.d.getVar("IPKGCONF_SDK") > > -- > 2.7.4 > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#146595): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/146595 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/79594382/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
