On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 13:46 +0100, Michael Ho wrote:
> From: Michael Ho <michael...@bmw.de>
> 
> Switch do_populate_sdk for the ipk package manager to use a separate target
> opkg config file and separate the lockfiles restricting do_rootfs and
> do_populate_sdk from running in parallel.
> 
> This way if an image recipe includes a dependency to do_populate_sdk by
> default then it will run in parallel to do_rootfs saving time compared to the
> sequential execution.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ho <michael...@bmw.de>
> ---
>  meta/classes/package_ipk.bbclass | 1 +
>  meta/classes/rootfs_ipk.bbclass  | 4 ++--
>  meta/lib/oe/sdk.py               | 4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Personally, I don't think this is a potentially problematic backport
candidate as we don't even know it works in master and it exposes
dunfell to lots of potential races...

Cheers,

Richard


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#146609): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/146609
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/79594400/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to