I think it will be good to do so

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 5:40 PM Nathan Rossi <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 at 03:40, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Nathan
> >
> > Can you check if your patch is still needed after
> >
> >
> https://github.com/kraj/gcc/commit/0411ae7f08e0f5a8b02ff313d26d27a0f6d1bb34
>
> Hi Khem,
>
> I tested this change and it resolves the configuration issue. Did you
> want the above change backported to replace the oe specific patch?
> Since that oe specific patch has already been backported to a number
> of releases.
>
> Thanks,
> Nathan
>
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:35 AM Nathan Rossi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > When compiling gcc-runtime for i686 libatomic, libgomp and libitm are
> > > compiled with additional '-march' and '-mtune' overrides. This
> typically
> > > does not cause build errors (e.g. core2-32 tune), and results in less
> > > optimally tuned outputs. However with specific TUNE_CCARGS (e.g. has
> > > '-mfpmath=sse' but not '-msse*'), the build errors with conflicting
> > > '-mfpmath' options.
> > >
> > > This is caused by gcc-runtime specific configure scripts and Makefile
> > > options that override by adding additional '-march'/'-mtune' args. OE
> > > builds gcc-runtime differently to other build systems, and provides
> > > target specific arch/tune options directly. As such, this change adds a
> > > patch for gcc to remove the specific cases where the args are added.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Rossi <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.2.inc             |   1 +
> > >  .../gcc/0001-lib-Remove-i-86-march-overrides.patch | 113
> +++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644
> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc/0001-lib-Remove-i-86-march-overrides.patch
> > >
> > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.2.inc
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.2.inc
> > > index e88f2ade6d..1e69c91311 100644
> > > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.2.inc
> > > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-10.2.inc
> > > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
> > >
>  file://0002-aarch64-Introduce-SLS-mitigation-for-RET-and-BR-inst.patch \
> > >             file://0003-aarch64-Mitigate-SLS-for-BLR-instruction.patch
> \
> > >
>  file://0001-aarch64-Fix-up-__aarch64_cas16_acq_rel-fallback.patch \
> > > +           file://0001-lib-Remove-i-86-march-overrides.patch \
> > >  "
> > >  SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> "b8dd4368bb9c7f0b98188317ee0254dd8cc99d1e3a18d0ff146c855fe16c1d8c"
> > >
> > > diff --git
> a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc/0001-lib-Remove-i-86-march-overrides.patch
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc/0001-lib-Remove-i-86-march-overrides.patch
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000000..3f04e121ba
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc/0001-lib-Remove-i-86-march-overrides.patch
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
> > > +From 3776789cde95916f95deef48acf9532b0ebf91ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > +From: Nathan Rossi <[email protected]>
> > > +Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 11:43:36 +1000
> > > +Subject: [PATCH] lib*: Remove i*86 march overrides
> > > +
> > > +OE does not pass the '--with-arch' option to gccs configure, as such
> > > +some gcc-runtime libraries try to override the value of '-march' and
> > > +'-mtune' which OE already provides. This causes conflicts with other
> > > +i*86 instruction/architecture flags (e.g. -msse* and -mfpmath=*).
> > > +Additionally this caused the following libraries to be built with less
> > > +optimized tune configurations.
> > > +
> > > +Upstream suggests that this should be detecting or otherwise checking
> if
> > > +the target supports the desired functionality before overriding.
> > > +
> > > +    https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg01344.html
> > > +
> > > +libatomic also overrides the '-march' specifically for IFUNC objects.
> > > +OE already supplies the correct march flag, so remove setting.
> > > +
> > > +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [OE Specific]
> > > +Signed-off-by: Nathan Rossi <[email protected]>
> > > +---
> > > + libatomic/Makefile.am   | 1 -
> > > + libatomic/Makefile.in   | 1 -
> > > + libatomic/configure.tgt | 9 ---------
> > > + libgomp/configure.tgt   | 8 --------
> > > + libitm/configure.tgt    | 9 ---------
> > > + 5 files changed, 28 deletions(-)
> > > +
> > > +diff --git a/libatomic/Makefile.am b/libatomic/Makefile.am
> > > +index ac1ca64587..5aa16e0699 100644
> > > +--- a/libatomic/Makefile.am
> > > ++++ b/libatomic/Makefile.am
> > > +@@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ libatomic_la_LIBADD += $(foreach
> s,$(SIZES),$(addsuffix _$(s)_1_.lo,$(SIZEOBJS))
> > > + libatomic_la_LIBADD += $(addsuffix _8_2_.lo,$(SIZEOBJS))
> > > + endif
> > > + if ARCH_I386
> > > +-IFUNC_OPTIONS      = -march=i586
> > > + libatomic_la_LIBADD += $(addsuffix _8_1_.lo,$(SIZEOBJS))
> > > + endif
> > > + if ARCH_X86_64
> > > +diff --git a/libatomic/Makefile.in b/libatomic/Makefile.in
> > > +index 97df2d7ff0..82c511d420 100644
> > > +--- a/libatomic/Makefile.in
> > > ++++ b/libatomic/Makefile.in
> > > +@@ -432,7 +432,6 @@ libatomic_la_LIBADD = $(foreach
> s,$(SIZES),$(addsuffix \
> > > +       _$(s)_.lo,$(SIZEOBJS))) $(am__append_1) $(am__append_2) \
> > > +       $(am__append_3) $(am__append_4)
> > > + @ARCH_ARM_LINUX_TRUE@@HAVE_IFUNC_TRUE@IFUNC_OPTIONS =
> -march=armv7-a+fp -DHAVE_KERNEL64
> > > +-@ARCH_I386_TRUE@@HAVE_IFUNC_TRUE@IFUNC_OPTIONS = -march=i586
> > > + @ARCH_X86_64_TRUE@@HAVE_IFUNC_TRUE@IFUNC_OPTIONS = -mcx16
> > > + libatomic_convenience_la_SOURCES = $(libatomic_la_SOURCES)
> > > + libatomic_convenience_la_LIBADD = $(libatomic_la_LIBADD)
> > > +diff --git a/libatomic/configure.tgt b/libatomic/configure.tgt
> > > +index 5dd0926d20..3cc41773c3 100644
> > > +--- a/libatomic/configure.tgt
> > > ++++ b/libatomic/configure.tgt
> > > +@@ -82,15 +82,6 @@ case "${target_cpu}" in
> > > +       ;;
> > > +
> > > +   i[3456]86)
> > > +-      case " ${CC} ${CFLAGS} " in
> > > +-        *" -m64 "*|*" -mx32 "*)
> > > +-          ;;
> > > +-        *)
> > > +-          if test -z "$with_arch"; then
> > > +-            XCFLAGS="${XCFLAGS} -march=i486 -mtune=${target_cpu}"
> > > +-            XCFLAGS="${XCFLAGS} -fomit-frame-pointer"
> > > +-          fi
> > > +-      esac
> > > +       ARCH=x86
> > > +       # ??? Detect when -march=i686 is already enabled.
> > > +       try_ifunc=yes
> > > +diff --git a/libgomp/configure.tgt b/libgomp/configure.tgt
> > > +index 4790a31e39..46c4c958e6 100644
> > > +--- a/libgomp/configure.tgt
> > > ++++ b/libgomp/configure.tgt
> > > +@@ -72,14 +72,6 @@ if test x$enable_linux_futex = xyes; then
> > > +     # Note that bare i386 is not included here.  We need cmpxchg.
> > > +     i[456]86-*-linux*)
> > > +       config_path="linux/x86 linux posix"
> > > +-      case " ${CC} ${CFLAGS} " in
> > > +-        *" -m64 "*|*" -mx32 "*)
> > > +-          ;;
> > > +-        *)
> > > +-          if test -z "$with_arch"; then
> > > +-            XCFLAGS="${XCFLAGS} -march=i486 -mtune=${target_cpu}"
> > > +-          fi
> > > +-      esac
> > > +       ;;
> > > +
> > > +     # Similar jiggery-pokery for x86_64 multilibs, except here we
> > > +diff --git a/libitm/configure.tgt b/libitm/configure.tgt
> > > +index 04109160e9..3d78ea609d 100644
> > > +--- a/libitm/configure.tgt
> > > ++++ b/libitm/configure.tgt
> > > +@@ -59,15 +59,6 @@ case "${target_cpu}" in
> > > +   arm*)               ARCH=arm ;;
> > > +
> > > +   i[3456]86)
> > > +-      case " ${CC} ${CFLAGS} " in
> > > +-        *" -m64 "*|*" -mx32 "*)
> > > +-          ;;
> > > +-        *)
> > > +-          if test -z "$with_arch"; then
> > > +-            XCFLAGS="${XCFLAGS} -march=i486 -mtune=${target_cpu}"
> > > +-            XCFLAGS="${XCFLAGS} -fomit-frame-pointer"
> > > +-          fi
> > > +-      esac
> > > +       XCFLAGS="${XCFLAGS} -mrtm"
> > > +       ARCH=x86
> > > +       ;;
> > > ---
> > > 2.29.2
> > >
> > > 
> > >
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#146930): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/146930
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/78972297/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to