Thanks for helping with CVE's!

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 6:14 AM saloni <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Added security fix for below CVE:
>
> CVE-2020-14145
> Link: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-14145
> Link: 
> https://anongit.mindrot.org/openssh.git/commit/?id=b3855ff053f5078ec3d3c653cdaedefaa5fc362d
>
> Signed-off-by: Saloni Jain <[email protected]>
> ---
>  .../openssh/openssh/CVE-2020-14145.patch           | 87 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  meta/recipes-connectivity/openssh/openssh_8.4p1.bb |  3 +-
>  2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-connectivity/openssh/openssh/CVE-2020-14145.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssh/openssh/CVE-2020-14145.patch 
> b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssh/openssh/CVE-2020-14145.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..50bf74d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssh/openssh/CVE-2020-14145.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
> +From b3855ff053f5078ec3d3c653cdaedefaa5fc362d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> +Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 05:23:03 +0000
> +Subject: upstream: tweak the client hostkey preference ordering algorithm to
> +
> +prefer the default ordering if the user has a key that matches the
> +best-preference default algorithm.
> +
> +feedback and ok markus@
> +
> +OpenBSD-Commit-ID: a92dd7d7520ddd95c0a16786a7519e6d0167d35f
> +CVE: CVE-2020-14145
> +Upstream-Status: Backport 
> [https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-14145]
> +Comment: 1 hunk with comment changes removed.

Needs your Signed-off-by here.  See "Patch name convention and commit
message" section at:

https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Security

> +---
> + sshconnect2.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> + 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/sshconnect2.c b/sshconnect2.c
> +index 347e348c..f64aae66 100644
> +@@ -102,12 +102,25 @@ verify_host_key_callback(struct sshkey *hostkey, 
> struct ssh *ssh)
> +       return 0;
> + }
> +
> ++/* Returns the first item from a comma-separated algorithm list */
> ++static char *
> ++first_alg(const char *algs)
> ++{
> ++      char *ret, *cp;
> ++
> ++      ret = xstrdup(algs);
> ++      if ((cp = strchr(ret, ',')) != NULL)
> ++              *cp = '\0';
> ++      return ret;
> ++}
> ++
> + static char *
> + order_hostkeyalgs(char *host, struct sockaddr *hostaddr, u_short port)
> + {
> +-      char *oavail, *avail, *first, *last, *alg, *hostname, *ret;
> ++      char *oavail = NULL, *avail = NULL, *first = NULL, *last = NULL;
> ++      char *alg = NULL, *hostname = NULL, *ret = NULL, *best = NULL;
> +       size_t maxlen;
> +-      struct hostkeys *hostkeys;
> ++      struct hostkeys *hostkeys = NULL;
> +       int ktype;
> +       u_int i;
> +
> +@@ -119,6 +132,26 @@ order_hostkeyalgs(char *host, struct sockaddr 
> *hostaddr, u_short port)
> +       for (i = 0; i < options.num_system_hostfiles; i++)
> +               load_hostkeys(hostkeys, hostname, 
> options.system_hostfiles[i]);
> +
> ++      /*
> ++       * If a plain public key exists that matches the type of the best
> ++       * preference HostkeyAlgorithms, then use the whole list as is.
> ++       * Note that we ignore whether the best preference algorithm is a
> ++       * certificate type, as sshconnect.c will downgrade certs to
> ++       * plain keys if necessary.
> ++       */
> ++      best = first_alg(options.hostkeyalgorithms);
> ++      if (lookup_key_in_hostkeys_by_type(hostkeys,
> ++          sshkey_type_plain(sshkey_type_from_name(best)), NULL)) {
> ++              debug3("%s: have matching best-preference key type %s, "
> ++                  "using HostkeyAlgorithms verbatim", __func__, best);
> ++              ret = xstrdup(options.hostkeyalgorithms);
> ++              goto out;
> ++      }
> ++
> ++      /*
> ++       * Otherwise, prefer the host key algorithms that match known keys
> ++       * while keeping the ordering of HostkeyAlgorithms as much as 
> possible.
> ++       */
> +       oavail = avail = xstrdup(options.hostkeyalgorithms);
> +       maxlen = strlen(avail) + 1;
> +       first = xmalloc(maxlen);
> +@@ -159,6 +192,8 @@ order_hostkeyalgs(char *host, struct sockaddr *hostaddr, 
> u_short port)
> +       if (*first != '\0')
> +               debug3("%s: prefer hostkeyalgs: %s", __func__, first);
> +
> ++ out:
> ++      free(best);
> +       free(first);
> +       free(last);
> +       free(hostname);
> +--
> +cgit v1.2.3
> +
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssh/openssh_8.4p1.bb 
> b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssh/openssh_8.4p1.bb
> index 688fc8a..b71e156 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssh/openssh_8.4p1.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssh/openssh_8.4p1.bb
> @@ -24,12 +24,13 @@ SRC_URI = 
> "http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/portable/openssh-${PV}.tar
>             file://fix-potential-signed-overflow-in-pointer-arithmatic.patch \
>             file://sshd_check_keys \
>             file://add-test-support-for-busybox.patch \
> +           file://CVE-2020-14145.patch \
>             "
>  SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
> "5a01d22e407eb1c05ba8a8f7c654d388a13e9f226e4ed33bd38748dafa1d2b24"
>
>  # This CVE is specific to OpenSSH server, as used in Fedora and Red Hat 
> Enterprise Linux 7
>  # and when running in a Kerberos environment. As such it is not relevant to 
> OpenEmbedded
> -CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST += "CVE-2014-9278"
> +CVE_CHECK_WHITELIST += "CVE-2014-9278 CVE-2020-15778"

Why are you modifying the whitelist here?

Steve

>  PAM_SRC_URI = "file://sshd"
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and 
> is the property of the KPIT Technologies Ltd. It is intended only for the 
> person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
> are not authorized to read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or 
> use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, 
> please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. 
> KPIT Technologies Ltd. does not accept any liability for virus infected mails.
>
> 
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#147036): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/147036
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/79981996/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to