Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com>
---
 ...ort-for-io_pgetevents_time64-syscall.patch | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../openssl/openssl_1.1.1i.bb                 |  4 ++
 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 
meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/0003-Add-support-for-io_pgetevents_time64-syscall.patch

diff --git 
a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/0003-Add-support-for-io_pgetevents_time64-syscall.patch
 
b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/0003-Add-support-for-io_pgetevents_time64-syscall.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..591354fbb9
--- /dev/null
+++ 
b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/0003-Add-support-for-io_pgetevents_time64-syscall.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+From d1a1b797d961301fd58513e50ac5de9ad5b8bc08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com>
+Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:56:21 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH] Add support for io_pgetevents_time64 syscall
+
+32-bit architectures that are y2038 safe don't include syscalls that use
+32-bit time_t. Instead these architectures have suffixed syscalls that
+always use a 64-bit time_t. In the case of the io_getevents syscall the
+syscall has been replaced with the io_pgetevents_time64 syscall instead.
+
+This patch changes the io_getevents() function to use the correct
+syscall based on the avaliable syscalls and the time_t size. We will
+only use the new 64-bit time_t syscall if the architecture is using a
+64-bit time_t. This is to avoid having to deal with 32/64-bit
+conversions and relying on a 64-bit timespec struct on 32-bit time_t
+platforms. As of Linux 5.3 there are no 32-bit time_t architectures
+without __NR_io_getevents. In the future if a 32-bit time_t architecture
+wants to use the 64-bit syscalls we can handle the conversion.
+
+This fixes build failures on 32-bit RISC-V.
+
+Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com>
+Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9819]
+---
+ engines/e_afalg.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
+
+diff --git a/engines/e_afalg.c b/engines/e_afalg.c
+index dacbe358cb..99516cb1bb 100644
+--- a/engines/e_afalg.c
++++ b/engines/e_afalg.c
+@@ -125,7 +125,23 @@ static ossl_inline int io_getevents(aio_context_t ctx, 
long min, long max,
+                                struct io_event *events,
+                                struct timespec *timeout)
+ {
++#if defined(__NR_io_getevents)
+     return syscall(__NR_io_getevents, ctx, min, max, events, timeout);
++#elif defined(__NR_io_pgetevents_time64)
++    /* Let's only support the 64 suffix syscalls for 64-bit time_t.
++     * This simplifies the code for us as we don't need to use a 64-bit
++     * version of timespec with a 32-bit time_t and handle converting
++     * between 64-bit and 32-bit times and check for overflows.
++     */
++    if (sizeof(timeout->tv_sec) == 8)
++        return syscall(__NR_io_pgetevents_time64, ctx, min, max, events, 
timeout, NULL);
++    else {
++        errno = ENOSYS;
++        return -1;
++    }
++#else
++# error "We require either the io_getevents syscall or 
__NR_io_pgetevents_time64."
++#endif
+ }
+ 
+ static void afalg_waitfd_cleanup(ASYNC_WAIT_CTX *ctx, const void *key,
+-- 
+2.23.0
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1i.bb 
b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1i.bb
index 86950f7544..599d78abea 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1i.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl_1.1.1i.bb
@@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ SRC_URI_append_class-nativesdk = " \
            file://environment.d-openssl.sh \
            "
 
+SRC_URI_append_riscv32 = " \
+           file://0003-Add-support-for-io_pgetevents_time64-syscall.patch \
+          "
+
 SRC_URI[sha256sum] = 
"e8be6a35fe41d10603c3cc635e93289ed00bf34b79671a3a4de64fcee00d5242"
 
 inherit lib_package multilib_header multilib_script ptest
-- 
2.30.0

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#147968): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/147968
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/80562146/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to