Le ven. 12 févr. 2021 à 06:48, Ross Burton <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 04:54, Guillaume Champagne > <[email protected]> wrote: > > This fixes bug #12503. Sending this as an RFC since I'm not sure what to > > do with autobuilder-worker-prereq-tests. It fetches a qemuboot.conf from > > yoctoproject.org, but this cannot be changed yet to qemuboot.json since > > it doesn't exist on there. > > I understand that you're simply fixing a newcomer bug but I just don't > see the rationale behind the bug in the first place. Copying in > Robert for his opinion. > > I'm unaware of any real world limitations of INI files that are a > problem for runqemu. We either break compatibility with existing > builds, or have two separate parsing codepaths in runqemu which
Fair enough, I asked a question to that effect on the bugzilla report a month ago but didn't get an answer. Someone should eventually close this ticket / remove it from the newcomer list before you get other contribution attempts regarding this . > complicates things more (as the ini path won't get tested). > > Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#148073): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/148073 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/80577032/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
