I have to note that x86 ptest is not affected and runs fine, so this may not have been fully researched. Could it be specific to arm?
Alex On Wed 3. Mar 2021 at 22.33, Ross Burton <[email protected]> wrote: > Discussion with the libinput maintainer has confirmed that many of the > libinput test cases need to run on a relatively unloaded system, > because input handling is by definition time-sensitive and any > event mismatches are considered a failure to avoid broken code hiding. > > We can't expect libinput to run on an otherside unloaded machine > because the autobuilder ptests execute in a qemu at the same time > as builds can be happening. We can however reduce the amount of > parallellism happening in the libinput test suite to give it a better > chance of succeeding. > > This may not be enough, but it's worth a go. > > [ YOCTO #14164 ] > > Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <[email protected]> > --- > meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/libinput/run-ptest | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/libinput/run-ptest > b/meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/libinput/run-ptest > index 5a84c568b9..d11e6eb25b 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/libinput/run-ptest > +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/wayland/libinput/run-ptest > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > #!/bin/sh > > -/usr/libexec/libinput/libinput-test-suite > +/usr/libexec/libinput/libinput-test-suite -j1 > if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then > echo 'PASS: libinput-test-suite' > else > -- > 2.25.1 > > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#148907): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/148907 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/81063024/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
