On 2021-03-12 3:44 p.m., dorinda bassey wrote:
Alright, I get you.
Will send a v3 RFC.

I think it'll be ready to merge so drop the RFC!
../Randy


Thanks,
Dorinda.

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:11 AM Randy MacLeod <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 2021-03-08 4:12 p.m., Dorinda wrote:
     > This test is to keep track of recipes that do not have a HOMEPAGE
    or DESCRIPTION,
     > with exceptions to recipes whose SRC_URI are not linked to
    external sources.
     >
     > [YOCTO #13471]
     >
     > Signed-off-by: Dorinda Bassey <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
     > ---
     > v2:
     > -Changed PN to BPN
     > -Used set() instead of lists
     > -Changed condition for checking recipes with missing DESCRIPTION
     >
     >   meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py | 36
    ++++++++++++++++++++++
     >   1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
     >
     > diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
    b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
     > index e1cfc3b621..633bf25dc7 100644
     > --- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
     > +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/distrodata.py
     > @@ -40,6 +40,42 @@ but their recipes claim otherwise by setting
    UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN. Please re
     >   """ + "\n".join(regressed_successes)
     >           self.assertTrue(len(regressed_failures) == 0 and
    len(regressed_successes) == 0, msg)
     >
     > +    def test_missing_homepg(self):
     > +        """
     > +        Summary:     Test for oe-core recipes that don't have a
    HOMEPAGE or DESCRIPTION
     > +        Expected:    All oe-core recipes should have a
    DESCRIPTION entry
     > +        Expected:    All oe-core recipes should have a HOMEPAGE
    entry except for recipes that are not fetched from external sources.
     > +        Product:     oe-core
     > +        """
     > +        with bb.tinfoil.Tinfoil() as tinfoil:
     > +            tinfoil.prepare(config_only=False)
     > +            no_description = set()
     > +            no_homepage = set()

    Since the other tests in this file such as:
          def test_maintainers(self):
    uses lists rather than set()s:
                  with_maintainer_list = []
                  no_maintainer_list = []

                  missing_recipes = []
                  recipes = []

    Maybe pick one data structure to be consistent.

    If you decide that set() is better then make a separate commit to
    change that. Apparently sets are faster for some operations:
    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2831212/python-sets-vs-lists
    <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2831212/python-sets-vs-lists>
    it would be nice if you checked and documented what you find in the
    commit log since these tests do take a few minutes on a lowly laptop.

    The rest looks good to me. Drop the RFC if you send a v3.

    Thanks!
    ../Randy


     > +            for fn in tinfoil.all_recipe_files(variants=False):
     > +                if not '/meta/recipes-' in fn:
     > +                    # We are only interested in OE-Core
     > +                    continue
     > +                rd = tinfoil.parse_recipe_file(fn, appends=False)
     > +                pn = rd.getVar('BPN')
     > +                srcfile = rd.getVar('SRC_URI').split()
     > +                #Since DESCRIPTION defaults to SUMMARY if not
    set, we are only interested in recipes without DESCRIPTION or SUMMARY
     > +                if not (rd.getVar('SUMMARY') or
    rd.getVar('DESCRIPTION')):
     > +                    no_description.add((pn, fn))
     > +                if not rd.getVar('HOMEPAGE'):
     > +                    if srcfile and srcfile[0].startswith('file')
    or not rd.getVar('SRC_URI'):
     > +                        # We are only interested in recipes
    SRC_URI fetched from external sources
     > +                        continue
     > +                    no_homepage.add((pn, fn))
     > +        if no_homepage:
     > +            self.fail("""
     > +The following recipes do not have a HOMEPAGE. Please add an
    entry for HOMEPAGE in the recipe.
     > +""" + "\n".join(['%s (%s)' % i for i in no_homepage]))
     > +
     > +        if no_description:
     > +            self.fail("""
     > +The following recipes do not have a DESCRIPTION. Please add an
    entry for DESCRIPTION in the recipe.
     > +""" + "\n".join(['%s (%s)' % i for i in no_description]))
     > +
     >       def test_maintainers(self):
     >           """
     >           Summary:     Test that oe-core recipes have a
    maintainer and entries in maintainers list have a recipe
     >
     >
     >
> >


-- # Randy MacLeod
    # Wind River Linux



--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#149418): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/149418
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/81185617/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to