The previous fix was in the right direction but needed to account for the section alignment of the current section. Tweak the patch to handle this.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> --- .../patchelf/patchelf/alignmentfix.patch | 20 ++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/patchelf/patchelf/alignmentfix.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/patchelf/patchelf/alignmentfix.patch index 62e11a5e7f8..a06876e50a1 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/patchelf/patchelf/alignmentfix.patch +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/patchelf/patchelf/alignmentfix.patch @@ -31,12 +31,14 @@ Index: git/src/patchelf.cc =================================================================== --- git.orig/src/patchelf.cc +++ git/src/patchelf.cc -@@ -1035,6 +1035,8 @@ void ElfFile<ElfFileParamNames>::normali - phdrs.push_back(new_phdr); - - curr_off += size; -+ /* The next section offset would be aligned */ -+ curr_off = roundUp(curr_off, sectionAlignment); - } - } - wri(hdr->e_phnum, phdrs.size()); +@@ -1010,8 +1010,9 @@ void ElfFile<ElfFileParamNames>::normali + size_t size = 0; + for (const auto & shdr : shdrs) { + if (rdi(shdr.sh_type) != SHT_NOTE) continue; +- if (rdi(shdr.sh_offset) != curr_off) continue; ++ if (rdi(shdr.sh_offset) != roundUp(curr_off, rdi(shdr.sh_addralign))) continue; + size = rdi(shdr.sh_size); ++ curr_off = roundUp(curr_off, rdi(shdr.sh_addralign)); + break; + } + if (size == 0) -- 2.30.2
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#151179): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/151179 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/82538730/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
