Hi Peter, On Sun, 2021-07-04 at 10:21 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Sun, 2021-07-04 at 10:59 +0200, Peter Bergin wrote: > > On 2021-07-03 16:55, Mittal, Anuj wrote: > > > On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 13:59 +0200, Peter Bergin wrote: > > > > This reverts commit 10aa1291979fb90bed1beb49be4d406ed0e1e4d5. > > > > > > > > As there is no build dependency between libubootenv and the > > > > configuration > > > > of u-boot there is no reason to check for UBOOT_CONFIG or > > > > UBOOT_MACHINE > > > > by adding the class uboot-config. Revert this in order to > > > > remove > > > > useless > > > > workaround in bsp layer (meta-freescale). > > > This was added to address failures in world builds: > > > > > > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/141757 > > > > > > If this is not required, then I think we'd need to address those > > > failures. > > > > Thanks for the pointer about the reason for this patch. I searched > > a bit > > but could not find it. > > > > Can you please help me define 'world builds'? > > "bitbake world" > > i.e. build everything > > > By reading the mail thread my thoughts are that the obvious thing > > is > > that the build has a bad configuration as u-boot is skipped. This > > should > > be the thing to solve. > > Not every MACHINE will support u-boot or have a configuration for it.
Do you have a fix for this? This patch was applied and now the world builds for MACHINEs not supporting u-boot are failing. Do you mind if I send a revert of your patch? Thanks, Anuj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#153589): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/153589 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/83938334/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
