On Wed, 2021-07-07 at 17:43 +0100, Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org 
wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-07-07 at 14:05 +0100, Mike Crowe wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 July 2021 at 13:25:17 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2021-07-07 at 12:53 +0100, Mike Crowe via lists.openembedded.org 
> > > wrote:
> > > > We're using LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE to create ${PN}-lic package files and
> > > > relying on the automatically generated recommends to cause them to be
> > > > installed in the image. This works well for most packages, but fails for
> > > > packages where we only install package created using PACKAGES_DYNAMIC.
> > > > 
> > > > For example, liborc is being installed in our image but that package 
> > > > lacks
> > > > a recommends for orc-lic, so the licences that apply to it are not being
> > > > installed. This is because license.bbclass:add_package_and_files 
> > > > iterates
> > > > only over the packages listed in PACKAGES.
> > > > 
> > > > Steps to reproduce on current master:
> > > > 
> > > > $ echo 'LICENSE_CREATE_PACKAGE = "1"' >> conf/local.conf
> > > > $ bitbake orc
> > > > $ dpkg-deb -I 
> > > > tmp-glibc/deploy/ipk/armv7vet2hf-neon/orc_0.4.32-r0_armv7vet2hf-neon.ipk|grep
> > > >  Recommends
> > > >  Recommends: orc-lic
> > > > $ dpkg-deb -I 
> > > > tmp-glibc/deploy/ipk/armv7vet2hf-neon/liborc-0.4-0_0.4.32-r0_armv7vet2hf-neon.ipk|grep
> > > >  Recommends
> > > > $
> > > > 
> > > > (I would have expected the last command to produce the same output as 
> > > > the
> > > > penultimate one.)
> > > > 
> > > > Even if I could fathom out how to fix orc and any other recipes so that 
> > > > they
> > > > did add the ${PN}-lic dependency, I'd be worried about not noticing that
> > > > the problem affected other recipes in the future.
> > > > 
> > > > Is there a way to teach license.bbclass:add_package_and_files to add the
> > > > ${PN}-lic recommends for dynamic packages, or would it be necessary to
> > > > teach package.bbclass to do so?
> > > 
> > > That all sounds rather horrible :/.
> > > 
> > > Would IMAGE_INSTALL_COMPLEMENTARY += "*-lic" work instead?
> > 
> > That seems to have worked well.
> > 
> > I wonder whether this means that it would be better to stop adding the
> > recommends automatically and tell users that need this to use
> > IMAGE_INSTALL_COMPLEMENTARY instead (either directly, or by teaching
> > license_image.bbclass to modify it based on another variable.)
> 
> That would seem the better option to me at least...

To be clear, I'd definitely support dropping that existing RRECOMMENDS code,
I think there are better ways to handle this now. I may even write that patch :)

Cheers,

Richard

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#153656): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/153656
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/84042415/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to