On Mon, 2021-07-26 at 14:40 -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 12:27 PM Ruslan Babayev (fib) <f...@cisco.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > Thanks for reviewing the patches. I understand the problem of merging this > > patch as is. > > But Dunfell currently has a host contamination issue on systems with zstd > > installed as part of base OS resulting in broken cmake-native recipe. Can > > you help bring this up to the attention of the steering committee? > > Perhaps Richard can comment on this. You are asking for a feature > change to dunfell that involves modifications in both > openembedded-core and meta-openembedded. So both technical steering > committees would need to agree that this is appropriate.
We don't have to go straight to the TSC, the layer maintainers can try and agree a plan first. I've added Armin as meta-openembedded maintainer for dunfell. Context: cmake-native suffers host contamination on dunfell due to zstd being detected on the host. The upstream cmake community say they don't support configuring it without it. Do we agree we should move zstd from meta-oe to oe-core in dunfell to fix this? Should we patch cmake in dunfell to try and use it's own copy of zstd internally? The latter is more risky in that we've not tried that and multiple configures can be 'fun' in builds. Moving the recipe has a different kind of pain. Thoughts? Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#154151): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/154151 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/84410822/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
