On 01/09/2012 04:13 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 16:01 -0800, Saul Wold wrote:
On 01/06/2012 09:13 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 21:10 -0800, Saul Wold wrote:
On 01/06/2012 06:34 PM, [email protected] wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi<[email protected]>
<SNIP>
With all the discussion about License related stuff on the list and IRC,
I think we should be creating a bbclass to define and hold these flags.
Then there is just a call from base.bbclass into check_license_flags
and return True/False for the skip_package().
So move this code into a separate .bbclass, ok.
Move this code the license.bbclass or meta/lib/oe/licensee.py as
appropriate.
And based on a comment from Chris L. on the IRC, will this handle
package level LICENSE_FLAGS, this is recipe level currently, correct?
Right.
It could be you have some recipe with multiple binaries (for example)
some are OK and some are not and they are packaged separately. Can the
LICENSE_FLAGS handle this?
No, I don't think so, there's just the per-recipe LICENSE_FLAGS. How
would that be expanded to per-package?
I verified with Richard, I thought we could do per-package, we can not
currently, so LICENSE_FLAGS will be per-recipe now.
Possibly change in the future would be per-package.
Thanks for your work on this, I you have had to do some reworks, we are
just trying to get it right.
Sau!
Tom
Sau!
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
