Make the license more accurate by specifying the specific variant of BSD
license instead of the generic one. This helps with SPDX license
attribution as "BSD" is not a valid SPDX license.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <jpewhac...@gmail.com>
---
meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.5.1.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.5.1.bb
b/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.5.1.bb
index a349d8ac96..efcd27137f 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.5.1.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.5.1.bb
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ SECTION = "base"
# PAM is dual licensed under GPL and BSD.
# /etc/pam.d comes from Debian libpam-runtime in 2009-11 (at that time
# libpam-runtime-1.0.1 is GPLv2+), by openembedded
-LICENSE = "GPLv2+ | BSD"
+LICENSE = "GPLv2+ | BSD-3-Clause"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=7eb5c1bf854e8881005d673599ee74d3 \
file://libpamc/License;md5=a4da476a14c093fdc73be3c3c9ba8fb3 \
"
--
2.32.0
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#155586):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/155586
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/85302521/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
