On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 4:52 PM Richard Purdie < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-10-18 at 19:17 +0530, pgowda cve wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > > Thanks for the review and suggestion. > > > > > > I'm wondering if we should just add TCLIBC to PN unconditionally? > > > > I didn't want to add TCLIBC to the code when using default GLIBC. > > Hence, I tried to keep the folder default for GLIBC. > > > > However, if you suggest adding TCLIBC to PN unconditionally; > > I will modify the patch and submit. > > Lets try that please. > > There is a related issue Martin reported where the recipe is really > TUNE_ARCH > specific and not really TARGET_ARCH specific. One step at a time I guess > though. > I think you were referring to: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/156516 and it's currently even MACHINE_ARCH due to poking in MACHINEOVERRIDES variable, but in theory it should be possible to re-write the logic to be only TUNE_ARCH specific. Cheers,
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#157078): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/157078 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/85993368/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
