-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Will do! :)
This only affects the other patch series though, the recipe itself
should be fine now.
It seems the only question left open is this:
> > I think we can replace the patch 0001-Set-REPO_REV-to-v2.17.3.patch
> > with a post function
> > and with it we can reuse the SRCREV of the recipe. Something like:
> >
> > do_fix_rev(){
> > sed -i "s/REPO_REV = 'stable'/REPO_REV = '${SRCREV}'" ${S}/repo
> > }
> >
> > do_patch[postfuncs] += "do_fix_rev"
>
> Yeah... was thinking about that as well. Wasn't sure though if this
> would be considered bad practise. What do the others think about
> this?
Some feedback on this would be appreciated. Thanks!
- --
With best regards
Jasper Orschulko
DevOps Engineer
Tel. +49 30 58 58 14 265
Fax +49 30 58 58 14 999
[email protected]
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
iris-GmbH
infrared & intelligent sensors
Schnellerstraße 1-5 | 12439 Berlin
https://iris-sensing.com/
On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 14:05 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> Thanks, maybe you should write a test for offline builds as well then
> :)
>
> Alex
>
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 13:59, Jasper Orschulko
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > "[PATCH v3] fetch2/repo: Implement AUTOREV for repo fetcher"
> > contains
> > a
> > fix for this issue. Reproducing a build offline with only the
> > DL_DIR
> > should work now.
> >
> > We are currently still lacking the appropriate tests for the
> > fetcher.
> > These will follow soon.
> >
> > - --
> > With best regards
> >
> > Jasper Orschulko
> > DevOps Engineer
> >
> > Tel. +49 30 58 58 14 265
> > Fax +49 30 58 58 14 999
> > [email protected]
> >
> > • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
> >
> > iris-GmbH
> > infrared & intelligent sensors
> > Schnellerstraße 1-5 | 12439 Berlin
> >
> > https://iris-sensing.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2021-11-11 at 20:20 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 16:08, Jasper Orschulko
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > So if you have done this initial fetch of your sources and
> > > > stash
> > > > your
> > > > working dir away, you can do an offline build.
> > >
> > > But can you do an offline build without a prepopulated working
> > > dir?
> > > That's the crucial point: offline build should work in a freshly
> > set
> > > up build directory, without sstate cache, and with prepopulated
> > > DL_DIR only.
> > >
> > > Alex
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE4WyPMIC5Ap4+Ooo1Ygqew07VMNUFAmGSWb4ACgkQYgqew07V
> > MNVUYQgAgA6+8XI+JxtA532FNNIMAZG5ZGZ12GKvVkjoJErnzRf0RZxUG3UyNYmm
> > pSDcfbuodBmBbHxDBpN8VspToKZy8dKcm/jfe9UY7f9U39bZSNXSS3hNPqkqKP5J
> > jCg1zQfxjbW1aVSHJkQB5MoY/EDeoQVv7RI6RmcVsLJZxozPeYaOQWSdTNG/7czg
> > oFjKr6jtSOYO45teMGt3+2+AtAXhlzTgKZo33rX/tknS7f1+kkyNGLv0ssSP5Jcf
> > Bd8YbcdG9lqXKUo0A7rn9Q83YBdpIyA6+By159zzPy7bP8j9aqMH8nNWauahhcFS
> > sY39fiky57aEgMe7g1OZX8oRODowPA==
> > =hpAK
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE4WyPMIC5Ap4+Ooo1Ygqew07VMNUFAmGSXNkACgkQYgqew07V
MNUKmQf/UYTURPKZ0iY2MKPFB60WdnmsTKJMjotQlcVBUpiwQ6LhSpkfWRqOFLpN
na9cNZbYjGFeDNdL3d0ILOEQ+oVhLY7bQpj5Xb2nDsIWspjlHg1IkkvCVGa9zFb3
XALaDrGBrlad9KNhI4C2CmXjdJZgx3yBuuvK6mSiga5fs44QB/lBb9JOQGYucRt+
QeLkIatvFo1Jxzmc6tNkRr3osgacQroagHj4CISh5W+ezWqtdWHA5ndf4HvCNwJV
hkpyXtxeQDINGVGBsMnJkOIWRSStOviL66Q1h5/dgbJ23FXQuEkM9CyD19kXWSIW
ZSI6as4bzjDqDVPzCPWHDmQdSnJyXQ==
=aNK6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#158290):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/158290
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/86840389/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
