With the changes to binutils, perf's direct calls to ld break for mips n64.
We already have tweaks for n32 so match those with the ones for n64.

Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
---
 meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
index 7bbc1ad70c5..ec0c6efe15f 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
@@ -125,9 +125,11 @@ PERF_SRC ?= "Makefile \
 
 PERF_EXTRA_LDFLAGS = ""
 
-# MIPS N32
+# MIPS N32/N64
 PERF_EXTRA_LDFLAGS:mipsarchn32eb = "-m elf32btsmipn32"
 PERF_EXTRA_LDFLAGS:mipsarchn32el = "-m elf32ltsmipn32"
+PERF_EXTRA_LDFLAGS:mipsarchn64eb = "-m elf64btsmip"
+PERF_EXTRA_LDFLAGS:mipsarchn64el = "-m elf64ltsmip"
 
 do_compile() {
        # Linux kernel build system is expected to do the right thing
-- 
2.32.0

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#159507): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/159507
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87634357/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to