On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 18:38 +0800, Hsia-Jun Li wrote: > From: "Hsia-Jun(Randy) Li" <[email protected]> > > Both meson and cmake would work fine, left those GNU autotools, > customer script projects. > > The behaviour of meson would become that as the following for > the Android target: > lib/libfoo.so is the real binary library > lib/libfoo.so.x -> libfoo.so > lib/libfoo.so.x.y -> libfoo.so > > But when you tell the autotools the target host is android, > it won't make any difference in its output library. I would > like to fix that but I am not good at m4 script. > > Hsia-Jun(Randy) Li (3): > cmake.bbclass: support android os > classes/meson: support Android os > [WIP]: openssl: fix Android target
The first couple of patches look ok but I'd like to understand whether there is real world usable output from the build after applying them? If not, I think we should probably wait until we can see the bigger picture of what other changes would be needed to make this work rather than making tweaks piecemeal. Can you describe what level of functionality these patches give to a build? Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#159792): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/159792 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/87764530/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
