On Fri, 2022-03-18 at 12:08 +0100, Carlos Rafael Giani via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > I am preparing a patch for this. I am somewhat uncertain though if this is > considered an OK approach or a hack, since we could in theory add libunwind- > native as a libsdl2-native dependency, but libunwind-native itself has build > issues, as seen here: > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/91/builds/5624/steps/12/logs/stdio > To me, it seems that the "clean" solution would be to fix libunwind-native > then. But that may take longer (just guessing here, I have no idea about > libunwind). > Thoughts?
The key questions are: a) Can we fix unwind-native to work on centos7 where it breaks? If so, that is the best solution. b) What functionality do we lose if we disable unwind in libsdl? Is it minor debugging info or something we really do need? I'm afraid I don't know the answers to those questions so it makes the correct course of action hard to see. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#163447): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/163447 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/89607589/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
