On Fri, 2022-04-15 at 11:55 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The following two recipes use the similar sources, but their LICENSE are 
> different
> in the recipe:
> 
> meta-selftest/recipes-test/recipeutils/recipeutils-test_1.2.bb
> SRC_URI = 
> "http://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/lib/libxshmfence-1.2.tar.bz2";
> LICENSE = "Proprietary"
> 
> meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxshmfence_1.3.bb
> SRC_URI = 
> "https://www.x.org/releases//individual/lib/libxshmfence-1.3.tar.bz2";
> LICENSE = "MIT"
> 
> There is a COPYING file inside ibxshmfence-1.2.tar.bz2 and 
> libxshmfence-1.3.tar.bz2, they exactly the same:
> 
> $ diff libxshmfence-1.2/COPYING libxshmfence-1.3/COPYING
> 
> Please check the end for the full contents of COPYING, it's not either MIT or
> Proprietary, but should be a free software.
> 
> How to fix the LICENSE name, please? Add a license file called libxshmfence? 
> Any 
> comments is appreciated.

Having looked at a few SPDX licenses, I think this looks like HPND:

https://spdx.org/licenses/HPND.html

I suspect the license set in the recipeutils-test is there for testing purposes
and not as a "real" license but we probably need to make that clear, or only
modify it at runtime in the test.

Cheers,

Richard



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#164420): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/164420
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/90480400/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to