On Tue, 2022-06-28 at 07:55 +0000, Valek, Andrej wrote: > Hello Richard and Alex, > > Richard: > We tried to revert the commits which you mentioned and it didn't work. > > Alex: > Yes, is fully reproducible on latest master. > > bitbake core-image-minimal -c populate_sdk_ext > > eSDK installed via: poky-glibc-x86_64-core-image-minimal-cortexa15t2hf- > neon-qemuarm-toolchain-ext-4.1+snapshot.sh > > . environment-setup-cortexa15t2hf-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi > devtool modify busybox > > Sstate summary: Wanted 14 Local 0 Mirrors 0 Missed 14 Current 6 (0% > match, 30% complete) > > So it started a compilation of missing components. We are assuming, > that eSDK will include all build deps for all components in the image > and not just a deps for image itself.
Ok. To confirm, SDK_EXT_TYPE is set to full in both cases? Could you share the locked-sigs.inc file from both? I'd like to understand if the tools are there but not being used or whether they're really not there at all. Is there much of a size difference between the two eSDKs? I suspect some kind of bisection to track down the change causing the issue will be necessary unfortunately but at least that test case is relatively straightforward... Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#167336): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/167336 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/92019337/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
