On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 15:55, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess the go one might, and using it as a template for some of our > other workarounds might also help some of the other patches upstream > but I have no connection to golang so help there from anyone with > better connections might help. > > The gperf one is a workaround, I doubt it would be accepted upstream > unfortunately but I'm also not sure what else we can do about the > issue.
Right, I was just asking to go through the mechanics of the upstream submission. Basically trying to keep that weekly pending number from going up :) Maybe just the gperf patch then? If they don't want the patch, that's fine. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#167616): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/167616 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/92128673/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
