On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 18:41 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Em seg., 18 de jul. de 2022 às 18:18, Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> escreveu: > > > It does, indeed, but it doesn't seem related to this PR. > > > > > > Do you know if this has worked? > > > > > > I am asking as I did all development and testing using SDKMACHINE > > > ?= > > > 'x86_64' and even MACHINE ?= 'qemuarm64' worked just fine. > > > However, > > > looking at some of the logs above, it seems it is using an > > > SDKMACHINE > > > as i686, so this appears as a different issue for me. > > > > > > > rust-cross-canadian hasn't officially worked properly or been > > supported. In assessing whether a patch is better or worse, it is > > useful to know which cases regress and which improve. I had hoped > > this > > list of failures would be smaller. I will admit I don't know > > whether > > this is better or worse than before so I guess that is the next > > thing I > > need to determine. > > > > > I told you. I tried SDKMACHINE as x86_64 on a x86_64 host and this > worked. > > > What we don't know right now is which combinations work and which > > don't > > so we can't even tell people what is expected to work and what > > isn't/doesn't :( > > > > > See above. > > > I mentioned this report in case someone can work out the pattern, > > or > > even better, understand what a fix looks like... > > > > > I am not familiar enough to Rust boostrap to help here but we spent a > lot of time to get the SDK working and I think this is a step on the > right direction, at least.
Thanks, I do appreciate the patches. I think we've talked cross purposes as I did report my aarch64 test case issue previously and I thought this series was to attempt to fix things so the recipe did work generically. If I merge this to fix x86_64, I think people will then just ignore the other cases and things will remain broken there which worries me a lot and means we can't generically enable rust SDKs for the project and gain autobuilder testing to spot future regressions. Obviously you want your use case fixed though. I will try and evaluate things a bit more tomorrow. What I don't want to do is merge a fix which then makes it harder to get things correctly done in future though, particularly when I know there will be an instant backport request to an LTS as soon as I accept it for master. We never should have accepted these rust cross-canadian recipes at all as they are just broken :(. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#168262): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/168262 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/92292892/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
