Can we get this patch in ASAP?  meta-zephyr (and layers that use it)
have been broken for weeks now in kirkstone, and I can confirm that
this patch fixes the issue.

Thanks,
Jon

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:41 PM Steve Sakoman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
>
> This is a dummy shared object therefore reduce dependencies further by
> not requiring the C startup files, we wont use this shared library for
> anything useful anyway
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Zhukov <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <[email protected]>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc 
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc
> index c85b5888d4..8074bf1025 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc
> @@ -68,8 +68,7 @@ do_configure () {
>         # libstdc++ isn't built yet so CXX would error not able to find it 
> which breaks stdc++'s configure
>         # tests. Create a dummy empty lib for the purposes of configure.
>         mkdir -p ${WORKDIR}/dummylib
> -       touch ${WORKDIR}/dummylib/dummylib.c
> -       ${CC} ${WORKDIR}/dummylib/dummylib.c -shared -o 
> ${WORKDIR}/dummylib/libstdc++.so
> +       ${CC} -x c /dev/null -nostartfiles -shared -o 
> ${WORKDIR}/dummylib/libstdc++.so
>         for d in libgcc ${RUNTIMETARGET}; do
>                 echo "Configuring $d"
>                 rm -rf ${B}/${TARGET_SYS}/$d/
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> 
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#168750): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/168750
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/92640672/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to