On Mon, 2022-08-08 at 11:35 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 10:23, Alexander Kanavin via
> lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Usage of patchelf in uninative seems to be contained in
> > uninative_changeinterp, which can be tweaked
> > to handle r/o files before invoking patchelf. Was it that all usages
> > of it need to be tweaked similarly?
> 
> Ok, I couldnt find other usages of it that would require similar
> tweaking (icecc uses host patchelf if available, rust.inc/cargo.inc
> operate on only a few static filenames), so maybe it's ok to move what
> the patch does into uninative_changeinterp (add +r before invocation,
> restore original permissions after). Still better than carrying a
> rejected patch.

It feels like there is something we're missing. I wish I could remember
what :(.

Note that the testing cycle for changing patchelf is a pain as we need
to merge, create a uninative release and upgrade to before we have the
full cycle and know any change is fully working.

Cheers,

Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#169078): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/169078
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/92886974/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to