thats true. I'll add it as runtime dependency then
Am Mi, 24. Aug 2022 um 14:09:52 +0200 schrieb Quentin Schulz
<[email protected]>:
Hi all,
On 8/24/22 11:51, Luca Ceresoli via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
Hello Markus,
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:56:54 +0200
"Markus Volk" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello Luca,
Am Mi, 24. Aug 2022 um 10:54:40 +0200 schrieb Luca Ceresoli
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
I would think iwd should be an rdepends, not an rrecommends. Any
reson
for that? Or is it just an unintended extra ','?
Only reason for this was the fact, that iwd is not in oe-core so it
felt wrong somehow to set it RDEPEND
I see, that's fine, but I wonder whether this should be clarified in
a
comment. I'll be taking the patch for testing as is anyway.
IIRC the policy is to have a default configuration working. It is
fine to have PACKAGECONFIG options with dependencies on
recipes/packages not in the same layer.
Here, if someone builds with NO_RECOMMENDATIONS to have a minimal
setup but have iwd as WIRELESS_DAEMON, connman won't work because the
package won't be added to the image, it'll be a bit harder to debug
than a build failing because iwd recipe could not be found
(especially since I also didn't notice the additional comma).
Cheers,
Quentin
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#169813):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/169813
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/93208331/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
