On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 12:59, Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > The usptreamable version of the patch would probably be something which > splits the target names in no_atomics up into components and matched on > subsections of it rather than the whole string. My rust isn't really up > to doing that though. > > I didn't really want us to maintain a separate list of targets which > have atomics issues given it and the list in no_atomics would get out > of sync very easily too.
But then the same patch needs to be applied to (and maintained separately in) librsvg - and everything else that includes a copy of crossbeam. Perhaps it's worth to at least make the above suggestion about making it upstreamable in the patch commit message? Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#169851): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/169851 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/93245408/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
