On 11/02/12 05:02, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 22:30, Joshua Lock <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    The logic which looks for MACHINE overrides in SRC_URI and updates
    PACKAGE_ARCH
    accordingly doesn't account for SRC_URI overrides in layers.


It seems to address the issue but I think we need to support bbappend
with overrides.

Agreed, this patch adds hacky support for that. I am working on a more suitable patch to do this in a cleaner way.

If the layer doesn't use a machine override, then:

  * it is not machine depdendant, or
  * is a bug in the layer

People agree with this point of view?

I do.

Cheers,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
        Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
        Intel Open Source Technology Centre

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to