On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:58 AM Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 02:46, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks, I think we can also unbolt the workaround in librsvg as well. > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-gnome/librsvg/librsvg_2.54.5.bb > > b/meta/recipes-gnome/librsvg/librsvg_2.54.5.bb > > index fc52ae61c5..daf60217d4 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-gnome/librsvg/librsvg_2.54.5.bb > > +++ b/meta/recipes-gnome/librsvg/librsvg_2.54.5.bb > > @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ export RUST_TARGET = "${RUST_HOST_SYS}" > > RUSTFLAGS:append:mips = " --cfg crossbeam_no_atomic_64" > > RUSTFLAGS:append:mipsel = " --cfg crossbeam_no_atomic_64" > > RUSTFLAGS:append:powerpc = " --cfg crossbeam_no_atomic_64" > > -RUSTFLAGS:append:riscv32 = " --cfg crossbeam_no_atomic_64" > > Not yet. librsvg carries its own copy of crossbeam which is not > patched to use the provided standard lists.
right saw that > > So we should first merge some variant of crossbeam_atomic.patch > upstream. My previous attempt went nowhere: > https://github.com/crossbeam-rs/crossbeam/pull/751 > > Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#172153): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/172153 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/94464934/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
