On Fri, 2022-11-18 at 17:57 +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > Additionally I'm currently interested in kirkstone LTS branch so would like > any changes to be there too...
The idea is that we develop things in master, then they become available in the next LTS release, not the previous one. People somehow seem to think that we add development patches to master and immediately backport them to the last LTS. This is not how development or the LTS is meant to work :(. We've not going to be forced into poor interface/API choices just because people want things backported to the current LTS. This is why I'm so worried about the lack of planning and development happening on master, people need to be thinking and planning ahead. To be clear, this isn't just about this issue but a pattern we're seeing far more widely. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#173469): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/173469 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/95085492/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
