On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 14:09, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 13:56 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 13:53, Paul Eggleton >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Except here we are talking about a single patch that adds a single file, >> > which >> > is easily downloadable from the web interface. If it were more complicated >> > I >> > could understand the fuss, but right now this is almost ridiculous. >> >> It doesn't seem that easy; it seems Koen tried to apply it and it has failed. >> >> Besides, Robert didn't complain about people asking it to be resend. >> Who is complaining is Richard and I am just justifying the reasoning >> why it is more the logical to expect it to be done based on OE-Core. > > In this case, Richard is presenting the viewpoint he's heard expressed > by a number of people in private but who don't want to rock the boat on > the mailing list. I'd like to see the mailing list be a friendly place > where people don't get flamed for posting patches. Some of the recent > responses are less than friendly and I think its reasonable to try and > resolve this. > > I'm going to propose that if trees are poky based, the pull request > should indicate this. People can then act accordingly. No indication > means its oe-core derived.
If you look at *my* first reply to this thread I just asked him to resend it based on OE-Core - as he already did - so I could give it a test. This seemed quite friendly from my POV and he didn't complain. If people dislike it, it is better if they show up and don't hide behind you. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
